Head to head
We are one of the two, so read this knowing who wrote it. These are not competing versions of the same product. CoursePiracy tells you where your course is; we go and get it taken down. Which one you want depends entirely on whether you plan to file the notices yourself.
Pricing checked July 2026. Verify on each site before buying.
| CoursePiracy.com | Delister | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Scans, alerts, supplies templates | Scans, then files the notices |
| Price | $19, $49, or $149 per month; $29 one-time report | $79 per course, once |
| Free tier | One course scan per month | Free scan, no monthly cap |
| When you pay | Monthly, whether or not you file | On confirmed removal or de-index |
| Who sends the notice | You | Us, as your authorized agent |
| Focus | Course creators on any platform | 3D and design course creators |
Finding pirated copies of a course is a search problem, and it is mostly solved. Put your course title in quotes into a search engine with your own name next to it and you will turn up a good share of what is out there yourself, for nothing.
What takes the time is everything after the list. Most listing pages hold no file: they link out to a locker like Nitroflare, Rapidgator, Alfafile or MEGA, and the archive sits there. So each listing is two filings, not one, and each host has its own notice route, its own required fields, and its own idea of what counts as a valid complaint. Several of the sites in the 3D and design circuit publish no removal contact at all, which leaves a search de-index as the only remedy. Then the file reappears under a new link and you do it again.
That gap is the whole difference between these two products. CoursePiracy hands you a list and a template. If you are going to sit down and work the list, that is a cheap and sensible purchase. If the list is going to sit in your inbox growing, you have bought a monthly reminder that you are being robbed.
It is cheaper if you file yourself. $19 a month for ongoing monitoring across three courses is less than we charge to clear one, and if you are comfortable sending notices, the economics are on their side and stay there.
Continuous monitoring is their product, not an add-on. Their tiers are built around scan volume across a roster. Our monitoring exists but our centre of gravity is one-off clearance work.
They are platform-agnostic. They serve course creators wherever the course was sold and wherever it lands. We know one circuit deeply, which is an advantage inside it and a limitation outside it.
They have been at this longer. They are established in the category. We started in 2026.
The filing is the job, and we do it. We identify the host holding the archive, file there, and file a search de-index against the listing page. When a listing site publishes no removal contact, which several in this niche do not, the de-index is the entire remedy and it still works.
Our scan is free and uncapped. No monthly limit, no $29 for the fuller version. It runs live on the page and the verified report follows by email with named sites, live URLs and screenshots. Take it to CoursePiracy if you decide to file yourself; the findings are yours.
You pay for the result. $79 per course, charged once, and only when a listing is de-indexed from Google Search or the file is removed at the host. If nothing moves, you owe nothing.
If you do want to file yourself, we help for free. We publish step-by-step removal guides for the venues we file against most often, including the exact contact route for each. That is the part CoursePiracy sells templates for.
We are new and we offer no SLA. Delister is one person, which cuts both ways and you should know which: the person filing your notices is the person answering your email, and it is also why we do not quote a turnaround we cannot control. Our search de-indexing covers Google today and not Bing, which is a gap we are closing rather than one we are hiding. We do not cover Telegram or Discord: closed channels are not indexed, so nobody discovers your course there by searching for it, and a removal in a private channel is something no service can show you evidence of afterwards.
Answer one question: will you send the notices? If yes, CoursePiracy at $19 to $49 a month is the cheaper tool and you should buy it. If the answer is no, or if you tried once and gave up partway through a site that publishes no contact address, a detection subscription will not change the outcome and you want someone filing.
Yes, and it is a reasonable sanity check. Two scanners looking for the same course title will not return identical lists, and the overlap tells you something about both. Ours is free with no monthly cap and the report is yours to take anywhere.
Often, yes: reposts are the norm rather than the exception, and a course that leaked once usually leaks again. That is a genuine argument for a monitoring subscription, theirs or ours, after the first clearance is done. It is not an argument for paying monthly before anything has been filed.
Yes. Google accepts removal requests from any rights holder and most hosts or their infrastructure providers take abuse reports. It costs time rather than money, and our per-site guides walk through the exact steps for the venues in this niche, free.
A listing is de-indexed from Google Search, or the file is removed at the host. Either one, per course. That is the definition we bill against, and you can verify both yourself.
Before you subscribe to anything, find out what is out there today. The scan is free, runs live on the page, and the verified report with URLs and screenshots follows by email. No obligation, and the report is yours to take anywhere.