Comparison
This page compares the takedown services a course creator is likely to shortlist, including us, on pricing, model, and focus. We run one of them, so every section says plainly where the others win. For a closer look at a single matchup: vs DMCA Masters, vs CoursePiracy, vs DMCA.com.
Checked July 2026. Prices change; verify on each vendor's site before buying.
| Service | Pricing | Model | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoursePiracy.com | $29 one-time report; $19, $49, or $149 per month | Subscription plus one-off report | Course creators on any platform |
| DMCA Masters | $89, $179, or $359 per month by product count | Subscription | Course creators on Udemy, Teachable, Kajabi |
| DMCA.com | $10 per month DIY tools; managed takedowns from $199 per site ($399 and $599 tiers for complex cases) | Mixed | Anyone, any content type |
| Rulta | $109, $144, or $324 per month by name count | Subscription | OnlyFans and adult-content creators |
| Takedowns.ai | $199, $299, or $499 per month | Subscription | Agencies and adult-content creators at scale |
| Delister | $29/mo, 2 takedowns included, $19 each after; no charge in a quiet month | Metered subscription | 3D and design course creators |
CoursePiracy sells a $29 one-time piracy report and monitoring subscriptions at $19, $49, and $149 per month. They offer a free automated scanner on their homepage, they are established in the category, and they work for course creators on any platform rather than specializing. Choose them if you want a cheap automated monitoring subscription with a free scanner to test the waters first.
DMCA Masters prices by product count at $89, $179, and $359 per month, aimed at course creators on Udemy, Teachable, and Kajabi. They back the subscription with a 48-hour removal SLA or the month is free, a track record above 50,000 takedowns, and payment-processor blocking against repeat infringers. Choose them if you want a contractual response-time guarantee and the longest takedown track record in the course niche.
DMCA.com covers every content type with $10 per month DIY tools, managed takedowns starting at $199 per site (with $399 and $599 tiers for complex cases), and legal escalation beyond that. Their strengths are brand recognition, the protection badge many sites display, and a path from self-service through full legal escalation under one roof. Choose them if you want a widely recognized name, the badge, or the option to escalate a stubborn case to lawyers.
Rulta runs subscriptions at $109, $144, and $324 per month, priced by how many names you protect, and built for OnlyFans and adult-content creators. Their model is daily scanning at scale with workflows designed for agencies managing many creators, and their coverage extends to search engines beyond Google. Choose them if you are an adult-content creator or an agency in that space; that is what their tooling is tuned for.
Takedowns.ai charges $199, $299, or $499 per month and serves agencies and adult-content creators operating at volume. They differentiate on AI content fingerprinting, bulk scale, and an API for programmatic use. Choose them if you manage takedowns across many creators and need automation and an API more than you need a per-case price.
Delister charges $29 a month, which covers two takedowns; each further takedown that month is $19, and a month with nothing to file is not invoiced, and works with 3D, design, and photography course creators. Unlike the flat subscriptions above, we do not invoice a month where nothing needs filing, and we file against the specific pirate venues in these niches often enough to publish step-by-step removal guides for them. Most listings do not hold the file, so we file twice: once at the file host holding the archive, whether that is Nitroflare, Rapidgator, Alfafile, MEGA or a smaller locker, and once as a search de-index against the listing page. When a listing site publishes no removal contact, which several in this niche do not, the de-index is the whole remedy.
The downsides, stated plainly. We are new, we offer no SLA, and this is a solo operation. Our search de-indexing covers Google today and not Bing, which is a gap we are closing rather than one we are hiding. We do not cover Telegram or Discord. Choose us if you sell 3D or design courses and want pricing that follows takedown volume rather than catalog size; choose one of the services above if you need an SLA, adult-content coverage, or enterprise scale. A takedown, for billing, means a listing is de-indexed from Google Search or the file is removed at the host; we do not promise it stays down, only that we file again if it reappears.
Every service on this page will send you a list of notices filed. A notice is not a result, and the gap between the two is where money gets spent for nothing. Three checks you can run yourself, on us or on anyone else:
Search your own course title, in more than one engine. Put the exact title in quotes into Google and then into DuckDuckGo. If the pirate listing is gone from one and sitting under your own storefront in the other, the job is half done. Each search index keeps its own copy of the web and honours its own removal notices, so a Google de-index does nothing to Bing, and DuckDuckGo runs on Bing's index.
Click through to the file host. A listing page can come down while the archive stays live on the locker it pointed at. Anyone holding the direct link still gets your course. Ask which of the two happened, because "removed" covers both and they are not the same outcome.
Ask for the report ID, then ask what the status is now. Google issues a report ID at submission and a per-URL status later. Those are different things, and so is the effect: we have watched a report come back approved on all URLs while those URLs were still the top live results more than an hour later. A service quoting you the submission as proof of removal is quoting the wrong number.
Several services advertise breadth: Telegram channels, Discord servers, file hosts, and de-indexing across Bing, Yandex and DuckDuckGo as well as Google. It is worth knowing which parts of that list change your revenue.
The file host is where the copy dies. Most listing pages hold no file; they link out to a locker. Remove the file and every listing pointing at it goes dead at once. Any service you consider should be filing there, and you should ask which hosts they have working notice routes for.
Search de-indexing is where the lost sale is. Your buyer finds the free copy by searching your course name. Take the listing out of search and that path closes, even on sites that ignore takedown notices entirely. Google carries most of that traffic, which is why it is the first filing, and the other engines are worth adding rather than worth leading with.
Telegram and Discord reach people who already have the link. Closed channels are not indexed, so nobody discovers your course there by searching for it; they get invited. That makes the harm different in kind from a listing ranking against your checkout page, and it makes removal hard to verify, because there is no public search result to check afterwards. If a service lists these, ask how they would show you it came down. Breadth you cannot verify is worth less than a narrower claim you can.
It depends which part. Filing at the file host matters most: remove the archive and every listing pointing at it goes dead. Search de-indexing matters next, because buyers find the free copy by searching your course name, and Google carries most of that traffic. Telegram and Discord are closed channels nobody discovers by searching, so removals there are lower value for a course creator and hard to verify afterwards. Ask any service how it would prove a Telegram removal happened.
Search your exact course title in quotes in both Google and DuckDuckGo, since each index honours its own removal notices. Click through to the file host to see whether the archive is gone or only the listing page. And ask for the report ID plus its current per-URL status: a submission is not a removal, and a Google report can read approved while the URLs are still ranking.
The services on this page range from $10 per month for DIY tools to $499 per month for agency-scale subscriptions. One-off work runs from a $29 report to $200 per takedown. Delister charges $29 a month, which covers two takedowns; each further takedown that month is $19, and a month with nothing to file is not invoiced.
It is a standard model in services where the outcome is verifiable, and de-indexing is verifiable: you can search your course name and see what surfaces. The reason it is rare in this category is structural: a subscription business that skipped billing whenever nothing was filed would undercut its own recurring revenue. We are small enough that we can align the fee with what gets filed.
Yes. Google accepts removal requests from any rights holder, and most hosts or their infrastructure providers take abuse reports. It costs time rather than money: each site has its own process, and reposts mean repeating it. We publish free per-site guides that walk through the exact steps.
Google's own guidance says up to two weeks. In our filings in July 2026, listings stopped surfacing for course-name searches within days of submission. Host-side file removal is slower and less predictable, since it depends on the site or its host complying.
Match the model to your situation. Ongoing catalog at scale on mainstream platforms: a subscription like DMCA Masters or CoursePiracy. Adult content: Rulta or Takedowns.ai. A known brand and legal escalation: DMCA.com. A 3D or design course catalog priced by takedown volume rather than catalog size: us.
Before you pay anyone, find out what is out there today. We run a free piracy scan for any course creator: it runs live on the page with results in seconds, and the verified report with URLs and screenshots follows by email, no obligation. Take the report to any service on this page.